Malicious compliance is the deliberate act of provoking indignation by obeying a superior’s commands while understanding the outcome will be unpleasant. The term malicious obedience is also used to refer to malicious compliance. This generally takes the form of personnel conducting an operation in a way that contradicts the order’s objective while yet carrying out the order exactly as specified.
Malicious compliance is frequently associated with other social characteristics. Such as bad relationship management, micromanagement inclinations, poor leadership abilities, and duplicative or unsafe performance. Since malicious compliance may occur in any part of life, it is most commonly seen in employees as an act of resistance. Believing a certain corporate regulation is overly restrictive or foolish. In fact, it is a business setup designed to encourage balance, control, and consideration inside the organization. So, while breaching or breaking norms may appear to be enjoyable, it also displays traits that may not be liked or looked up to.
How does malicious compliance impact the performance of the business?
Malicious obedience has a distinct impact on each industry. While some companies may be able to get away with it, others may face consequences for not complying with the regulations. Malicious compliance is most common in the workplace. It is typically a reaction to unjust practices enforced by the corporation without regard for repercussions.
In such circumstances, employees often become rebellious and seek vengeance against their superiors or the firm by aggressively obeying commands. Even when they are aware that doing so would result in harm. The following are some of the most visible impacts of malicious compliance in organizations:
Damaged professional relations
Malicious compliance can lead to a breakdown of faith and the redistribution of labor and obligations. It can be difficult and inefficient to be unable to trust the staff with duties. This process is unhealthy and has a negative impact on the operation of your corporation. It is preferable to resolve such issues rather than allowing them to disrupt the workplace. Trust difficulties between the firm and its employees may be addressed by a variety of communication methods. Such as frequent employee check-ins or establishing an open-door policy to enable employees to freely share concerns with the administration.
Changes in policy
Even while not all malicious compliance actions are necessarily harmful, it is the purpose that drives the activity that is most important. Malicious compliance may or may not result in legal ramifications. Regardless of the result, these acts are the consequences of meticulous rule-following.
Even if there are no legal consequences, intentional compliance can harm your organization by making employees uncomfortable, necessitating an urgent adjustment in policy. When a loophole is discovered, your organization or decision-maker may have to rework procedures to ensure that the same error is not repeated by others.
If the act of malicious obedience has a direct impact on the job or becomes public, it is mirrored in the work’s output. This can harm your company’s reputation and impact your clients’ opinions about your business. The best approach to deal with this would preferably be damage control. However, the most effective method is to go through the problems of why they occurred. Consider what can be done to improve the situation to your company’s advantage. Without jeopardizing the company’s image or putting the employee at risk.
How to prevent malicious compliance?
It might be difficult to deal with workers who participate in malicious compliance. It may take some time and analysis of the case before you can decide whether to condemn the employee. Keep in mind that regardless of the status of the employee, they are still human beings. Self-respect must be maintained.
Taking this into consideration, the best approach to deal with malicious compliance is to prevent it from happening in the first place. So, how can you avoid malicious compliance while not causing harm to an employee? Here are a few examples:
Pay attention to employees’ opinions
There is a fair explanation for nearly every scenario that arises. Don’t be overly assertive the first time anything bad happens. Try to analyze what occurred and allow your employees to explain their actions and views. As a business owner, your focus should be on understanding why they behaved the way they did.
This stance towards the problem enables them to freely address an issue. Giving you the chance to assist them to think of a better way to cope with the circumstance the next time it happens. This may also be viewed as a chance to comprehend and learn about both new and recurring issues in a corporate setting. Being harsh with your staff will just exacerbate the problem.
Analyze and review the company’s policies
There is a good possibility that your policies and guidelines include flaws. It is preferable to return to them on a frequent basis. This will contribute to the maintenance of a positive work environment, the updating of rules, and the avoidance of any acts of malicious compliance. Once vulnerability in the policies is discovered, it is simple for others to exploit it. The ideal approach is to review policies on a regular basis. This will gradually and consistently seal your policies, leaving no opportunity for error.
Show faith in personnel
When a crisis occurs, it is essential to trust your staff. Depending on the circumstances, their actions may be warranted. However, to question their intuition may not help you have a constructive dialogue. Instead of questioning them, you might listen to them and help them realize what a better method would be in the future. In this manner, you can address the issue constructively and work as a team to solve the problem. Keep in mind that it is you and them vs the problem, not you versus them.
Example of malicious compliance
Consider a nightclub where security personnel failed to properly inspect a client. It was later discovered that the same customer was carrying alcohol into the establishment. The manager interrogated the security officer on how unprofessional it was not to thoroughly inspect the customer’s bag. The bodyguard attempted to explain to the management that he was doing a routine inspection and that intensive checks might lead to irritation of customers. His statement was disregarded, and he was embarrassed further.
After that, the security guard became furious and began to inspect each customer’s bags. Asking them to unload their bags and slowing down the admission procedure. Customers visiting the nightclub were irritated as a result. With several of them departed. This is an instance of malicious obedience by the employee. Since he complied with the improper goal of causing harm to the business by spreading negative publicity about how the company treats its customers.
Image source: Success